i2 write
quite often dint i you cant
complain of my not writing
i thought i would write to
say that i think Andrew3
is
better he was here yesterday
and i think his throat is
somewhat better he says it
is not but i know it is nancy4
was here last night she said
he was better he took home
some pie she said he eat
that and 3 eggs so his throat
couldent hurt him so bad
as it has he took cold
when he went in the country5
he was very bad when he
came back he said yesterday
he wanted some roast lamb
i said get a small peice
and have it cooked i told
him to have whatever he
wanted but to be saving
of what he had but to get
anything he could eat
duk.00429.002.jpg
but Walt it is no use
to talk they just get the very
most expensive things lamb
is 20 cents pr lb and tell about jim6
eating 4 eggs for his breakfast
other things not half so expensive7
would be much more healthy
for the child when Andrew went
away the first time he ha between
30 and 40 dollars so nancy said
when he went the second time
i gave him 10 he only staid
one night the first time an 2 o
3 the last8
and they get things
on credit to a grocery and their9
money is not much left i gess
they have got to move too the
landlord has told them
they must so now they expect
me tto pay the rent i told
nanc i would pay one month
walt they expect to much
from me i suppose martha10
has told nancy i have got
2 or 3 hundred dollars in the
bank they never gave Jim one
cent worth when he went
away not even a shirt when
Jeff11
has 18 mat said if they
work and got them as they
had done they could have
duk.00429.004.jpg
them12
to i said to mat the
other day in a joke if they had
another young one they would
be so stingy we wouldent know
what to doo but i got the same
old retort that it was me that
was stingy with my bank book13
that is such a common thing
to hear if i make any remark
that i would like to have any
thing [illegible] why donti get it with
my14
bank book
i told her the other day because
i had 2 or 3 hn dollar15
if i used
it all i might go to the poor
house sometimes i think i wish the bank book as they call it was
in guinea sis16 too says grandma
take your bank book i suppos
walt you ll think i are foolish
and childish but i get out
of patience sometimes Jeffy
wanted me to take Andrew
here17
he said he would
feed him well i dident
feel walter as if i could
undertake it they would
soon get tired of fixing things
for him and i know if i had
him i must have the whole
duk.00429.003.jpg
family i told Jeff i was
willing to doo all i could
for him but it would be too
much for me his complaint
makes him testy of course and
i thought walt i had about
enoughf Andrew says nanc
does every thing for him gets
him every thing any would
go to greenport18
to get him
any thing he wanted but she
has no econimy19
to get things
what is to become of them this
winter God only knows nancy
can get shirts to make at 6sh
a peice but she says she cant
take them20
georgegy is so cross
he aint a nice child21
at all
jim is better he is here almost
every day as dirty as a pig but
very healthy they talk of taking
part of a house in hampton st
the next to this when mrs more22
lived at any rate they have
got to moove sometimes i feel
as if i wished i was away from
every body i get tired and
think they expect too much from me
i feel pretty well since the
weather is cool but i am lame
in my knees at times quite bad
write on a piece of paper loose from
the letter if you say any thing you dont
want23 all to read
you got my letter and georges24
Although Louisa Van Velsor Whitman provided no clear clue about the date of this letter in her own hand, a wide range of contextual matters, some conflicting, make it possible to date this letter to a range between September 5 and September 23, 1863. Richard Maurice Bucke assigned the approximate date November 1, 1863 on an accompanying slip of paper in the Trent Collection (not reproduced here). Edwin Haviland Miller dated this letter September 3, 1863 (Walt Whitman, The Correspondence [New York: New York University Press, 1961–77], 1:144–145, n. 33). Dennis Berthold and Kenneth M. Price dated this letter both September 10? and September 15?, 1863 (see Thomas Jefferson "Jeff" Whitman's September 5, 1863 and September 24, 1863 letters to Walt Whitman).
Louisa either enclosed a letter from George Washington Whitman or had recently forwarded a letter from him with her previous letter (her postscript is ambiguous). As mail from George when he was stationed in Kentucky took approximately a week to reach Brooklyn (but often longer), Louisa may have enclosed George's September 7, 1863 letter. If a letter from George was enclosed with this or with Louisa's previous letter to Walt (not extant), the approximate range of dates for this letter extends from September 12 to September 23. A letter preceding George's September 7 letter, or an intermediate letter from George, may be lost, but Walt in his September 29, 1863 letter to Louisa wished for news from George: Walt's receipt of this letter from Louisa with George's letter enclosed thus rules out a date after September 23, 1863. This approximate range of dates (September 5 to September 23) is corroborated by topics in Jeff Whitman's September 24, 1863 letter to Walt, though some topics in Louisa's letter may suggest an earlier date.
Louisa was in sharp disagreement with Jeff and his wife Martha Mitchell "Mattie" Whitman over assistance that they could, or should, extend to the family of Andrew Jackson Whitman. Jeff and Mattie were willing to provide more nourishing food for Andrew because they feared neglect could contribute to his death, but Jeff and Mattie refused to provide direct aid to Andrew's wife Nancy and their children. Louisa challenged Jeff and Mattie to be more generous to James "Jimmy," Andrew and Nancy's son. Jeff and Mattie insisted that Louisa should use her "bank book"—her deposits of George's military pay—if she wished to assist Jimmy. Jeff charged Louisa with mistaken notions of economy—she scrimped on the food for herself and sons Jesse and Edward when George's military pay could provide relief.
Because Louisa again discussed the expense of Andrew's two drunken sprees—$30 and $10—on the heels of his recovery from a debilitating episode of pleurisy, this letter could date to near Louisa's August 31 to September 2, 1863 letter to Walt, in which Andrew's two sprees are mentioned with a sense that the second spree occurred within the past week. Jeff's suggestion—bringing Andrew into the Portland Avenue home, which Louisa rejected—also appears in Jeff's September 5, 1863 letter to Walt. The parallel between Jeff's suggestion on Andrew and Louisa's rejection of it may have prompted Miller's early September 3, 1863 date for this letter, but Louisa's reference to Jeff's suggestion in this letter is perfunctory, as a matter that she had long dismissed from consideration. Because no pattern of consistencies among topics is predominant, the letter is assigned to a date range from September 5 to September 23, 1863.
Louisa's September 25 or October 2, 1863 letter to Walt almost certain follows this one, and October 2 is a more likely date for that letter. However, if that letter dates to September 25 rather than October 2, this letter is likely to date earlier in the range of possible dates, to no later than September 18. The parallel passages with Jeff's September 5, 1863 and September 24, 1863 letters to Walt are annotated, and readers may judge for themselves which parallels offer the most convincing evidence for assigning this letter within the range from September 5 to September 23, 1863.
[back]Mattie was a skilled seamstress who had engaged in contract sewing to supplement Jeff's income, and Robert Roper has determined that Jeff and Mattie had purchased an expensive sewing machine (Now the Drum of War [New York: Walker, 2008], 92–93).
Like Whitman scholars who have followed, neither Jeff nor Louisa extended sympathy to Andrew's wife Nancy McClure Whitman, whom Louisa described as dirty and as being on the street (see her September 25 or October 2, 1863 and her December 25, 1863 letters to Walt). Gay Wilson Allen referred to Nancy's "extravagance," repeated Louisa's adjectives "dirty, ugly, and lazy," and referred to Nancy's being in the street as "misconduct" (The Solitary Singer: A Critical Biography of Walt Whitman, revised edition, [New York: New York University Press, 1967], 304, 306, 308). Even if Nancy was judged an inadequate housekeeper by the standards of Louisa and Mattie, Louisa's and Jeff's letters provide hints that the combination of Andrew's drinking sprees, his expensive medical treatments (see Jeff's October 15, 1863 letter to Walt), and Nancy's pregnancy rendered her and her children financially vulnerable. The financial strain that both Jeff and Louisa assumed for Andrew's illness and approaching death and their fears for George may have inured them to Nancy's suffering.
Their attitude toward Nancy may have been entwined with their ethnic prejudice toward Irish immigrants. After the New York City draft riots, Jeff gave vent to his hatred for Irish immigrants: "I hear that [Michigan Regiments] made fearful havoc with the irish ranks. Twas better so—they did not have that 'citizen feeling' that our militia would have had. The only feeling I have is that I fear that they did not kill enough of 'em Walt. I'm perfectly rabid on an Irishman I hate them worse than I thought I could hate anything" (see Jeff's July 19, 1863 letter to Walt Whitman). Louisa in her July 20, 1870 letter speculated that one positive result of the Franco-Prussian War would be if it inspired some Irish immigrants to leave the United States.
[back]