duk.00520.001.jpg
13 March 68
friday afternoon1
Dear Walt
i
have just
got your letter with 2 dol
and the paper2
i have not
read it yet but shall this
afternoon i had to write
to tell you what i had
done i couldent feel
contented till i did well
i havent committed any
crime but i have spent
the money order you sent
me for something i have
always wanted but never
was able to get well i have
got a lounge it was quite
cheap and good hair cloth
but after i got it i thought
i hadent ought to spent
the money but now i have
told you i shall feel better
but i have
duk.00520.002.jpg
got a little money left
besides the 2 dolrs you sent
me to day i thought i would
be saving and george3
was
gone so i would get it
so walt i can get along
if you send me about
2 dollars next week4
i am glad you are going
to have new cloths i dont
see how you doo to make
your cloths last so long georg
is getting somethings every
month) i gess this is the last
peice of furniture i shall
get i always wanted a
lounge now i have got one
i had a letter from Jeff5
i beleeve i told you Davis was here
tuesday evening and he and
Baynton his partner in Jersey
is to come here this afternoon6
that is the cause of my not
reading the paper
duk.00520.003.jpg
i have been baking some
bread and cake as davis goes
away to night so i thought
he would probably stay
to tea i seem to have quite
a number call to see me
among the number was
Ellen vanwyck she says
she liked you and would
like to see you
she is quite
out of health she stayed and
had a cup of tea) ann vanwyk
sister Ester i dont think you
ever saw her she married
a man by the name of J baylis7
he had a farm when they were
married but drinked and
sported it all away and
they now live here in great
poverty he has been in the
hospitall he got drunk and
was took to the station house
and he tryed to cut his throat
but dident succeed
duk.00520.004.jpg
John vanwy helps her8 i beleeve
but so it is every one has their
troubles) you go i see walt
to mrs Borroughs9 yet how
does mrs Oconor10
and she get
along mrs Oconor thought they
would not perhaps i told her
she must doo like mrs black11
when the woman up stairs said
she woulden live with children
mrs black told her they would
get along nicely)
george and i was talking
about if the impeachment12
was
carried if it would make
any change with you we
thought speed would be
the one that would take the
place of stansbury)13
doo you
know walt i have always
felt a kind of sadness when
i read the articles of impeac
not but14
what i always thought he was
bad but there is so many things to
be considered) i sent and got the sun
to see how the election went15
my love to mrs and mr Oconor
and mrs and mr Borroughs
Correspondent:
Louisa Van Velsor Whitman (1795–1873) married
Walter Whitman, Sr., in 1816; together they had nine children, of whom Walt was
the second. The close relationship between Louisa and her son Walt contributed
to his liberal view of gender representation and his sense of comradeship. For
more information on Louisa Van Velsor Whitman, see Sherry Ceniza, "Whitman, Louisa Van Velsor (1795–1873)," Walt
Whitman: An Encyclopedia, ed. J.R. LeMaster and Donald D. Kummings (New
York: Garland Publishing, 1998).
Notes
- 1.
March 20, 1868 is the
most likely date for this letter; however, March 13 and March 27, 1868 are
also possible. Louisa Van Velsor Whitman dated the letter only "friday
afternoon." The letter may date to March 13, 1868, as suggested by Richard
Maurice Bucke. Clarence Gohdes and Rollo G. Silver assigned the same date
(Faint Clews & Indirections: Manuscripts of Walt
Whitman and His Family [Durham, North Carolina: Duke University
Press, 1949], 194), and Edwin Haviland Miller cited Gohdes and Silver's date
(Walt Whitman, The Correspondence [New York: New York
University Press, 1961–77], 2:365). The evidence for dating the letter
to March 13, 1868 is indirect, and the letter more probably dates to a week
or two later.
Attorney General Richard Stanberry resigned his office on March 12, 1868 to
serve as legal counsel during Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial. Walt
Whitman served as a clerk in the office of the attorney general, and Louisa
Van Velsor Whitman conveyed her discussion with son George Washington
Whitman about Walt's prospects after Stanberry was replaced. March 12, 1868,
a Friday, is therefore the earliest possible date for the letter. The
letter, however, mentions a recent letter from Thomas Jefferson "Jeff"
Whitman, and Louisa had also acknowledged a previous letter from Jeff in her
March 11, 1868 letter to Walt. If both of
Louisa's letters refer to the same letter from Jeff, March 13, 1868 is the
correct date. But since Louisa conveyed no news from Jeff nor from Martha
Mitchell "Mattie" Whitman (Jeff's wife), the letter presumably acknowledges
a later but non-extant letter from Jeff. Because Jeff was overwhelmed with
work, it is unlikely that he wrote two letters to his mother within the span
of three days; therefore, March 20, 1868 is a more probable date for this
letter.
[back]
- 2. Edwin Haviland Miller dated
this lost letter from Walt Whitman to March 12, 1868 (Walt Whitman, The Correspondence [New York: New York University Press,
1961–77], 2:360). If the present letter dates to March 20 or March 27,
1868, which is more likely than March 13, Walt's lost letter would also date a
week or two later. [back]
- 3. George Washington Whitman
(1829–1901) was the sixth child of Louisa Van Velsor Whitman and Walter
Whitman, Sr., and ten years Walt Whitman's junior. George enlisted in the Union
Army in 1861 and remained on active duty until the end of the Civil War. He was
wounded in the First Battle of Fredericksburg (December 1862) and was taken
prisoner during the Battle of Poplar Grove (September 1864). After the war,
George returned to Brooklyn and began building houses on speculation, with a
partner named Smith and later a mason named French. George eventually took up a
position as inspector of pipes in Brooklyn and Camden. For more information on
George, see "Whitman, George Washington." [back]
- 4. Walt Whitman's mid- or late
March 1868 letter to Louisa Van Velsor Whitman is not extant. [back]
- 5. Thomas Jefferson Whitman
(1833–1890), known as "Jeff," was the son of Louisa Van Velsor Whitman and
Walter Whitman, Sr., and Walt Whitman's favorite brother. In early adulthood he
worked as a surveyor and topographical engineer. In the 1850s he began working
for the Brooklyn Water Works, at which he remained employed through the Civil
War. In 1867 Jeff became Superintendent of Water Works in St. Louis and became a
nationally recognized name in civil engineering. For more on Jeff, see "Whitman, Thomas Jefferson (1833–1890)." [back]
- 6. Joseph Phineas Davis
(1837–1917) took a degree in civil engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute in 1856 and then helped build the Brooklyn Water Works until 1861. He
was a topographical engineer in Peru from 1861 to 1865, after which he returned
to Brooklyn. Davis, a lifelong friend of Thomas Jefferson "Jeff" Whitman, shared
the Pacific Street house with Louisa Van Velsor Whitman, son Edward, and Jeff
Whitman's family before Jeff departed for St. Louis, and he visited Louisa while
serving as an engineer in Lowell, Massachusetts. Davis also served briefly as
the chief engineer for Prospect Park, near the Pacific Street house in Brooklyn
(see Louisa's May 31, 1866 letter to Walt
Whitman). For Davis's work with Jeff Whitman in St. Louis, see Jeff's May 23, 1867, January 21,
1869, and March 25, 1869 letters to Walt
Whitman. Davis eventually became city engineer of Boston (1871–1880) and
later served as chief engineer of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(1880–1908). For Davis's career, see Francis P. Stearns and Edward W.
Howe, "Joseph Phineas Davis," Journal of the Boston Society of
Civil Engineers 4 (December 1917), 437–442. [back]
- 7. Ann (or Anna) and Esther Van
Wyck (also spelled "Van Wycke") were sisters. Ellen Van Wyck was an in-law. Anna
Van Wyck had boarded with the Whitmans in Brooklyn, and the Van Wyck family farm
was near Colyer farm, which had belonged to Jesse Whitman, Walt Whitman's
paternal grandfather. See Bertha H. Funnel, Whitman on Long
Island (Port Washington, New York: Kennikat Press, 1971), 78. John
Robbins Baylis (1838–1882?) married Esther Van Wycke (1838–1913) on
October 1, 1857 (http://www.longislandsurnames.com). [back]
- 8. Clarence Gohdes and Rollo G.
Silver transcribed the name as "Varny" (Faint Clews &
Indirections: Manuscripts of Walt Whitman and His Family [Durham, North
Carolina: Duke University Press, 1949], 195), but Louisa Van Velsor Whitman
probably wrote "John vanwy," a shortened spelling of Van Wyck (or Van Wycke).
John Van Wyck has not been identified, but he was probably a relative of Anna or
Esther Van Wyck. [back]
- 9. Ursula North
(1836–1917) married John Burroughs in 1857 and became a friend to Walt
Whitman, a frequent guest in the Burroughs household. The marriage faltered over
matters of sexual incompatibility, and Whitman sided with Ursula against John's
sexual "wantonness" and eventual infidelity. John Burroughs traveled a great
deal for his job as a bank examiner, and Ursula and Whitman visited frequently,
with Ursula visiting the poet after his stroke in 1873. For more on Whitman's
relationship with the Burroughses, see "Burroughs, John [1837–1921] and Ursula
[1836–1917]." [back]
- 10. For a time Walt Whitman
lived with William D. and Ellen M. "Nelly" O'Connor, who, with Charles Eldridge
and later John Burroughs, were to be his close associates during the Washington
years. William Douglas O'Connor (1832–1889) was the author of the
pro-Whitman pamphlet "The Good Gray Poet" in 1866. Nelly O'Connor had a close personal
relationship with Whitman, and the correspondence between Walt and Nelly is
almost as voluminous as the poet's correspondence with William. For more on
Whitman's relationship with the O'Connors, see "O'Connor, William Douglas (1832–1889)." [back]
- 11. Mrs. Black was a neighbor
of Louisa Van Velsor Whitman. She is also mentioned in Louisa's March 11, 1868 and March
16, 1870 letters to Walt. [back]
- 12. The United States House of
Representatives voted to bring articles of impeachment against President Andrew
Johnson on February 24, 1868. Louisa Van Velsor Whitman commented on the House
speeches prior to the vote in her February 25,
1868 letter to Walt. [back]
- 13. James Speed
(1812–1887), attorney general under Abraham Lincoln, continued to serve
under President Andrew Johnson but resigned in July 1866 over Reconstruction
policies. Henry Stanbery (1803–1881) succeeded Speed, and he resigned on
March 12, 1868, the month of this letter, to serve as President Johnson's
counsel during the impeachment trial. Walt Whitman had served as clerk in the
office of the attorney general under Speed and Stanbery. He continued to serve
under Orville Browning (1806–1881), a temporary stand-in after Stanbery
resigned, and under William M. Evarts (1818–1901), who succeeded Browning.
For Whitman's assessment of his prospects during this unsettled period,
including concern that James Harlan, who had fired him from the Department of
the Interior, might be appointed, see his April 10,
1868 letter to Abby H. Price. [back]
- 14. The first six or so letters
of the word "impeachment" are inserted above the words "not but"; however, no
mark indicates the place of insertion. Louisa Van Velsor Whitman presumably
intended to write "articles of impeachment," inadvertently omitted the word
"impeachment," and inserted the partial word in the available space. [back]
- 15. Louisa Van Velsor Whitman
likely refers to the Baltimore Sun, which was known for
its political coverage, but it is not known which election she was following. In
March 1868 the Sun reported election results in Maryland
(March 7), New Hampshire (March 10 and 16), Kentucky (March 10), Alabama (March
11), Louisiana (March 13), Florida (March 16), and Connecticut (March
18). [back]