i2 sat down and let every thing go to write this it seems so long since i have written to you well georgey3 came home on saturday and went back on sunday and matt and the children went back with him he insisted when he first came home on saturday on their going but i think he got rather sorry he did before they started i think he wished matt4 to go but the children5 was so noisey he got sick of his bargain if i had felt well i wouldent let them go i hope matty will like her)6 but its very evedent she will be boss george has spent 700 dollars for his house i think he will not add much to his bank book) i know walt you will say mother is childish but walt there is such a difference when he used to come home he would ask me if i wanted any thing when he went down town saturday but it was so different this time
burn this letter up
duk.00603.002.jpgwhen he was going away he asked me if i dident want some money i said i would like to have a little as matt had used her money all the time she had been here he gave me six dollars) he makes 14 dollars and over per day) but walt there is no knowing what or how a man may change when he gets married george is certainly the last one you would think as he always was set in his way) but as you say by my putting a bed in the front room wonders will never cease i got your letter walter dear and the money order was glad to have it dident expect to get it till this week and hatt got her graphe7 she said aint uncle walt good) the children is very noisey and wild but matt is so kind to me i put up with it all) when matt comes home she will give you a description i hope it will be favorable
good bie walt dearsend an envelope8
This letter dates to between March 7 and May 15, 1871. On an accompanying slip of paper held in the Trent Collection (not reproduced here), Richard Maurice Bucke dated the letter March 1871 with a note that George Washington Whitman, who married in "March '71," spent $700 on his house and is already living in Camden, New Jersey at the time of the letter.
George probably married Louisa Orr Haslam on March 14, 1871 (see Walt Whitman, "Marriages," Missouri Historical Society, reprinted in Notebooks and Unpublished Prose Manuscripts, ed. Edward F. Grier [New York: New York University Press, 1984], 27; and see H. Stanley Craig, Camden County New Jersey Marriages, 1837–1910: Records Filed in the Office of the County Clerk [Merchantville, New Jersey: H. Stanley Craig, 1932], 133). A March date for George's marriage conflicts with Whitman scholarly consensus, that he married Louisa Orr on April 14, 1871 (see Richard Maurice Bucke, "Genealogy of Whitman Family," Trent Collection, Duke University, reprinted in Gay Wilson Allen, The Solitary Singer [New York: Macmillan, 1955], 596). But because March 14 is both in Walt Whitman's hand and is derived independently from the records assembled by Craig, March 14 for the date of George's marriage is likely correct. Martha Mitchell "Mattie" Whitman and daughters arrived in Brooklyn no earlier than February 14 but perhaps several days later (see Louisa Van Velsor Whitman's February 9, 1871 letter to Walt Whitman). Another letter that may corroborate the March marriage is Louisa's March 19?–May 14?, 1871 letter to Walt. If a March 14 marriage date for George and Louisa Orr Haslam is assumed, and Mattie's family began their five- or six-week visit to Brooklyn and Camden in late February, this letter dates to just before the marriage (March 7?) or just after it (March 15–17?). The latest possible date for this letter can be inferred from Louisa Van Velsor Whitman's expectation that Mattie Whitman will report to Walt about Brooklyn after she returns "home," possibly to Brooklyn unless Mattie is returning to St. Louis directly from Camden. Mattie and family may be en route to St. Louis, or they may be visiting George and Louisa Orr near their marriage date. Louisa's next extant letter to Walt, June 13, 1871, refers to St. Louis but not to Mattie's recent visit, so Mattie and family had returned to St. Louis by mid-May.
To summarize, this letter could date to some days before George and Louisa's marriage (March 7?), to just after their marriage (March 15–17?), or to just before the return of Mattie and daughters to St. Louis (March 30–May 14?). If Louisa's March 19?–May 14?, 1871 letter dates April 30, the latest possible date for this letter is a week or two after that letter, from May 7 to May 15, 1871. However, this letter is likely to date earlier, to just after Mattie and daughters visit George and Louisa Orr in Camden near their marriage.
[back]