loc.01084.001_large.jpg
Oakenholt1
Liscard: Cheshire, England
31st January 1880
two sets (4 Vols) sent Feb
19 (three sets gone) all gone March 18 '80
Dear Sir
In a letter which I have just received from Mr Ruskin2 he says as follows "I have not time just at present to write such
a letter to Mr Whitman as I should like, will you kindly transmit the value of enclosed
cheque to him with request for five copies"—
Mr Ruskin in his correspondence with me expressed his utter astonishment at
what I had told him about your pecuniary position,—which he read of first in
an article of mine which I send you by this post—
Will you Kindly send five
copies of your last 2 Volume Edition addressed to me as above, for which I enclose a
draft upon New York—£10 10/.
It gives me a deep sincere pleasure to write this note, but I should like to say about
my article, that I have since3
loc.01084.002_large.jpg
Notes
- 1. Herbert J. Bathgate was a British
author and friend of the art critic John Ruskin. His essay "Ouida" was
advertised in the 1881 Trübner & Co. reprint of Whitman's preface to
his first edition of Leaves of Grass. Whitman commented
on Bathgate later in life: "Bathgate writes genuinely, considerately: he has no
affectations" (Horace Traubel, With Walt Whitman in
Camden, Monday, January 28, 1889). [back]
- 2. John Ruskin (1819–1900) was
one of the leading art critics in Victorian Great Britain. Whitman sent Leaves of Grass and a "couple of photographs" to Ruskin
via William Harrison Riley in March 1879 (see the letter from Whitman to Riley
of March 18, 1879). Ruskin, according to Whitman,
expressed "worry...[that] Leaves of Grass is...too personal, too emotional,
launched from the fires of...spinal passions, joys, yearnings" (see the
letter from Whitman to William O'Connor of October 7,
1882). Whitman, late in life, said to Horace Traubel: "[I] take my
Ruskin with some qualifications." Still, Ruskin "is not to be made little of: is
of unquestionable genius and nobility" (Horace Traubel, With
Walt Whitman in Camden, Thursday, January 24, 1889, 17). [back]
- 3. The letter is cut off
here but a transcription of the letter by William Douglas O'Connor shows that
Bathgate went on to quote a recent communication from Ruskin: "The reason
neither he (yourself) nor Emerson are read in England is first—that they
are deadly true—in the sense of rifles—against all our deadliest
sins. The second that this truth is asserted with an especial colour of American
egotism which good English scholars cannot, and bad ones will not endure. This
is the particular poison and tare by which the Devil has rendered their fruit
ungatherable but by gleaning and loving hands, or the blessed ones of the poor"
(Henry W. and Albert A. Berg Collection of English and American Literature, New
York Public Library). For Ruskin's January 29 letter to Bathgate, see William
Sloane Kennedy, Reminiscences of Walt Whitman (London:
Alexander Gardner, 1896), 84. See also the letter from Whitman to William
Harrison Riley of March 18, 1879. On February 16,
Whitman received from Ruskin £10 for five sets of books through Bathgate,
to whom the books were sent on February 19 (Whitman's Commonplace Book, Charles
E. Feinberg Collection of the Papers of Walt Whitman, 1839–1919, Library
of Congress, Washington, D.C.). [back]