I return the J. Burroughs1 Book. & the pamphlet with thanks. The Burroughs book fed me on my journey home, so that I had to buy no other reading.
I shall cherish the memory of that blessed January 2nd '85 to the end of my days.
My dear Whitman, I want you to regard me as a sort of son; tell me whenever I can do anything for you; let me loan you 5.00 if you get in a pinch, (& I have it). It is not always easy to borrow on real estate you know, or convenient I mean. & behave handsomely, & intimately & affectionately toward me.
I am going to enclose a $1.00 between fly-leaves of the Burroughs' book as half pay for a copy of the new edition of yr poems when it comes out. If it shd never come out, all right. I owe you $10. more anyway; for I loc.02599.002_large.jpg got you to make me a present of yr books under false pretenses. I have not lectured on you more than once, & shall feel that I am a fraud until I have sent you $10. Say not a word.
I know you are rich: all poets are. But I want you to have luxuries, now you are getting old.
If this humbug government were worth a copper spangle it wd have settled a handsome pension on you—an honorary life salary—as a recognition of your unparalleled services during the war. But it wd probably be odious to you to even have the subject whispered of ? ?
I found brave little wife well, & got a hearty welcome. Our pretty & remarkably smart cat died the day I returned—whereat tears & swelling breasts, & a private funeral.
I must send you my N. Orleans articles. My Creole article in Lit. Wld. is paid for, but not out for 3 weeks.
loc.02599.003_large.jpg ¶As is my paper entitled
"The New Ars Poetica"2
if you can get a certain number of copies disposed of in advance, enough to cover expense (say $25 (?)) it wd be the means of my being able to publish it. Dr. Bucke will take a certain number, & I shall sell a few I suppose. Wd 20 cts be too high a price for it?
Let me know what success you have in the matter. But dont go to any trouble.
Aff W. S. Kennedy over loc.02599.004_large.jpgIt strikes me that it wd be better to write that essay or preface, & let it be published among yr collected prose works say after yr death—rather than put it before the poems themselves. I too have "qualms" about this latter. Yr new poems will give value enough to the new edition.
I believe you will stand stronger, Walt, if you stick to yr old way of not explaining unless in a prose essay in a separate volume, as I said.
Correspondent:
William Sloane Kennedy
(1850–1929) was on the staff of the Philadelphia American and the Boston Transcript; he also
published biographies of Longfellow, Holmes, and Whittier (Dictionary of American Biography [New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1933], 336–337). Apparently Kennedy called on
the poet for the first time on November 21, 1880 (William Sloane Kennedy, Reminiscences of Walt Whitman [London: Alexander
Gardener, 1896], 1). Though Kennedy was to become a fierce defender of Whitman,
in his first published article he admitted reservations about the "coarse
indecencies of language" and protested that Whitman's ideal of democracy was
"too coarse and crude"; see The Californian, 3 (February
1881), 149–158. For more about Kennedy, see Katherine Reagan, "Kennedy, William Sloane (1850–1929)," Walt
Whitman: An Encyclopedia, ed. J.R. LeMaster and Donald D. Kummings (New
York: Garland Publishing, 1998).