I got your post card last Tuesday morning.1 I had not written for
some time because I waited till I had something to say about the essay on the L. of G. I was preparing for delivery here. They had promised me an earlier date
for it, but could not, in the end, find one till the 25th Sept. last, the day I got
your card on. It (i.e. the lecture) was delivered before the Dresden Literary
Society, consisting mostly of Professors & savants of all kinds.2 No one knew anything, or anything beyond the name, of
you, except Dr. Doehn, the author of a history of American Literature I told you
of.3 He spoke on my essay, and took the usual line of
intelligent and book-learned persons, thus—"He is a poet by God's
grace—but that is all" (and it isn't much, according to Dr. D.) "He is wanting
in two indispensable requisites for a great writer. (1) Knowledge—(2) Form."
As to the absence of knowledge, I can only conjecture that he meant that your poems
would not be regarded as historical studies, like Schillers 'Tell' &c. Two others
spoke—one a Dr. Hohlfeld, a man of much genuine thoughtfulness. He merely
pointed out some philosophical parallels between things I had said, and passages of
Schiller & Schleiermacher. A third speaker said a few words which showed that he
understood my drift—among other things he said what I had reported about you
reminded him of Wordsworth. Now this was really remarkable, for I had always held
that Wordsworth was the true predecessor of the L. of G. & on asking Edward Dowden once about this, he fully
confirmed what I had thought. ("Wordsworth is calculated to lead a courageous,
though not a timid, person loc_af.01042_large.jpg
loc_af.01043_large.jpgup to W.W.")4 Yet in writing my essay, I had no thought of him, nor
had mentioned him.—Now it so happens that another English friend here has,
about a year ago, delivered a lecture before the same Literary Soc. on Wordsworth. And we mean now to publish both lectures together with a
short preface showing in what direction the connection between you & Wordsworth is
to be looked for. I will send you some copies as soon as this appears, which will be
without delay. As to my translation of the L. of G. I am now ready to cooperate with any competent German, i.e. I have got a
good way in the actual rendering, & see how it is to be done, &c. & all I want
is a colleague to push on the work energetically with. But nothing of the kind has
as yet turned up (although intelligent & more or less sympathetic readers in
sufficient number.) Now do you know anyone whom you could put in connection with
me? It does not strike me as needful that he should live in this town. We could
easily arrange some system of work, through the post, & meet if necessary some
time? Perhaps my essay when published may lead to something. I got Dr. Bucke's
book.5 He was kind enough to send me a copy (I hope
my letter of acknowledgment did not fail to reach him). I think it will be of the
greatest service for all time (giving permanent expression to facts of great
interest & importance, but the theoretic part of it not going deep enough.) I will
send him my essay when it appears.
Nothing more to say now. Very glad to hear that you keep well.
Yours always T. W. Rolleston