I send you a letter, &c. I rec'd from Dowden, as you are alluded to. I have written to Dowden, today, & sent it off—so I suppose he will send you the books alluded to. Mine have arrived—Dowden advances, expands, or rather penetrates—the first two Chapters of his Shakespere, which I have read thoroughly, are very fine—(I have underlined passages on every page)2 —the Victor Hugo I have not yet read3 —
. . . I am pretty strong yet, & go out—but head, stomach & liver, all in a bad way, & seems as if nothing could bring them round.
Have rec'd a long & good letter from Rossetti4 which I will show you when you come. How are you getting along? How is 'Sula? . . .
WaltThe presentation copy of Dowden's Shakspere: A Critical Study of His Mind and Art (London: Henry S. King, 1875), now in the Charles E. Feinberg Collection of the Papers of Walt Whitman, 1839–1919, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., is marked on every page for the first eighty pages but only sporadically after that, although there are underlined passages throughout the entire volume. The underscoring in various kinds of pencils and comments dated in the 1880s indicate that Whitman examined Dowden's study several times.
In his reply to Whitman on July 27, 1875, Burroughs was not impressed with Dowden's book: "It does not differ very much from the rest of the critical literature of that subject, I do not yet see that it throws any new light. His Victor Hugo article strikes me as much more masterly."
[back]