yal.00312.001_large.jpg
R. WORTHINGTON,1
PUBLISHER,
750 BROADWAY.
New York,
Sept 29th
1879.
Mr Walt Whitman
Camden
N.J.
Dear Sir:
We have recently purchased at the Auction Rooms of Messrs Geo. A. Leavitt Co
of this city the electrotype plates of an edition of your "Leaves of Grass" bearing the imprint of Thayer
and Eldridge, Boston 1860–61.2 As the edition is not complete although subject
as I understand to a copyright of ten percent it seems to me that it would be better
for all parties to have it yal.00312.002_large.jpgcompleted. If this idea meets your views on the subject I would
be willing to make you an immediate payment of $250.00 on account and will do everything in my power to make the book
sell.3
An early reply would oblige
Your Truly
R. Worthington
P.S. Porter & Coates, Claxton Remsen & Hafflefinger of Philadelphia or Gebbie & Harris or any of the leading Houses of the country
would inform you that I am perfectly responsible & that you are sure of getting your
copyright.
R. W.
Notes
- 1. Richard Worthington was a New York
printer who published and sold unauthorized editions of Whitman's Leaves of Grass, printed from the plates of the 1860
edition. Whitman explains his claims against Worthington in his November 26, 1880, letter to Richard Watson Gilder.
For more on Worthington and the piracy controversy, see Jerome Loving, Walt Whitman: The Song of Himself (Berkeley: University
of California Press, 2000), 401, and Ed Folsom, Whitman Making Books/Books Making Whitman: A Catalog and
Commentary (University of Iowa: Obermann Center for Advanced Studies, 2005). [back]
- 2. For more on Thayer and Eldridge,
publishers of the third edition of Leaves of Grass, see
"Thayer, William Wilde (1829–1896) and Charles W. Eldridge
(1837–1903)," Walt Whitman: An
Encyclopedia, ed. J.R. LeMaster and Donald D. Kummings (New York:
Garland Publishing, 1998), [back]
- 3. For a discussion of the
Worthington affair, see the letter from Whitman to Richard Watson Gilder of November 26, 1880, where Worthington's letter,
which Whitman misinterpreted, is quoted. [back]