I kept elaborating the Dutch art. It is now in Clement's1 hands (ed. Transcript) & will appear soon I guess.2 I read up Taine's3 rich little "Art–in the Netherlands,"4 &c & have made a racy bit of work I think. I am not much in touch with Miss Gilder5 & her dilettante sheet. So tho't I cd read the proof of article better in Transcript—
I have wanted to say for long that I have read 3 times yr excellent article in Critic.6 Its choice & weighty diction makes us fellows despair. Walt, you have gained not lost one whit, as a prose writer. As for poetry, it must come when man is at the top of his condition you know.
affec W. S. Kennedy. loc.03080.002.jpgCorrespondent:
William Sloane Kennedy
(1850–1929) was on the staff of the Philadelphia American and the Boston Transcript; he also
published biographies of Longfellow, Holmes, and Whittier (Dictionary of American Biography [New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1933], 336–337). Apparently Kennedy called on
the poet for the first time on November 21, 1880 (William Sloane Kennedy, Reminiscences of Walt Whitman [London: Alexander
Gardener, 1896], 1). Though Kennedy was to become a fierce defender of Whitman,
in his first published article he admitted reservations about the "coarse
indecencies of language" and protested that Whitman's ideal of democracy was
"too coarse and crude"; see The Californian, 3 (February
1881), 149–158. For more about Kennedy, see Katherine Reagan, "Kennedy, William Sloane (1850–1929)," Walt
Whitman: An Encyclopedia, ed. J.R. LeMaster and Donald D. Kummings (New
York: Garland Publishing, 1998).